retrace our steps (2005), background and influences
i started assembling the librettro for retrace our steps at the end of my grad school experience sometime in spring of 03. i had never written any vocal music and was encouraged by vocalist nicole baker (who is on the faculty at csuf) to write her a piece.
background
i not really a "word" guy and have never been able to remember lyrics from any song, but writing for how the voice sounds was of course really appealing... duh.
influences
at the time i was writing retrace i was coming out of my grad school experience and had been studying major large scale works that represented composers at the top of their game. after studying monteverdi's coronation of poppea, bach's goldberg variations, and glass's einstein on the beach i had been blown away by the amazing artistic and contemplative music that each had written. these pieces really make it for me as a listening experience, but to dissect them and understand how they are organized and the logic used to create them was very humbling. did i feel that my first vocal piece attain those goals? not really, but after writing large amounts of consumable music i really wanted to play in a different sandbox.
during this time i was also very taken with my friend and mental collaborator sean ferguson's great piece society of the spectacle (2000?). watching its first performance was an electrifying experience and really motivated me to get off my ass and write. there are many similarities to both pieces (that should be discussed further) and we have had some great nights discussing my "plagiarism" of his work (the penultimate line in both of our pieces is plagiarism is necessary). the best thing of sean's spectacle that i stole was the way he used levels of obliqueness to create meaning in his text . although i think philip glass's non-narrative work einsten on the beach is the most important work written in the last 50 years, i do have one conceptual gripe with him and a few others. the non-narrative obliqueness of the text for three+ hours is a little much for my friends to endure. (i know... mtv generation) sean solved this problem beautifully by creating a non-narrative composition whose subject is vague and oblique (consumerism/alienation) and used levels of obliqueness to delay the first direct statement to the audience 3/4 of the way through his piece. he then retreats back into a more oblique setting of his libretto, leaving through the same rabbit hole he entered.
this was going to be my solution also... i could present a subject drama (oratorio) that contained a politically aggressive message by setting the text using various levels of obliqueness to obscure my "message". as the piece unfolded it would i would come out of the rabbit hole and "get to my point" and then immediately retreat into the symbols and layers of the assembled text.
in short, i had a strong message to convey, but didn't want to the performance to become "preachy" by dealing with the libretto in a direct fashion.
the pbe performs retrace our steps this sunday
background
i not really a "word" guy and have never been able to remember lyrics from any song, but writing for how the voice sounds was of course really appealing... duh.
influences
at the time i was writing retrace i was coming out of my grad school experience and had been studying major large scale works that represented composers at the top of their game. after studying monteverdi's coronation of poppea, bach's goldberg variations, and glass's einstein on the beach i had been blown away by the amazing artistic and contemplative music that each had written. these pieces really make it for me as a listening experience, but to dissect them and understand how they are organized and the logic used to create them was very humbling. did i feel that my first vocal piece attain those goals? not really, but after writing large amounts of consumable music i really wanted to play in a different sandbox.
during this time i was also very taken with my friend and mental collaborator sean ferguson's great piece society of the spectacle (2000?). watching its first performance was an electrifying experience and really motivated me to get off my ass and write. there are many similarities to both pieces (that should be discussed further) and we have had some great nights discussing my "plagiarism" of his work (the penultimate line in both of our pieces is plagiarism is necessary). the best thing of sean's spectacle that i stole was the way he used levels of obliqueness to create meaning in his text . although i think philip glass's non-narrative work einsten on the beach is the most important work written in the last 50 years, i do have one conceptual gripe with him and a few others. the non-narrative obliqueness of the text for three+ hours is a little much for my friends to endure. (i know... mtv generation) sean solved this problem beautifully by creating a non-narrative composition whose subject is vague and oblique (consumerism/alienation) and used levels of obliqueness to delay the first direct statement to the audience 3/4 of the way through his piece. he then retreats back into a more oblique setting of his libretto, leaving through the same rabbit hole he entered.
this was going to be my solution also... i could present a subject drama (oratorio) that contained a politically aggressive message by setting the text using various levels of obliqueness to obscure my "message". as the piece unfolded it would i would come out of the rabbit hole and "get to my point" and then immediately retreat into the symbols and layers of the assembled text.
in short, i had a strong message to convey, but didn't want to the performance to become "preachy" by dealing with the libretto in a direct fashion.
the pbe performs retrace our steps this sunday