newmusicland

daniel wolf cannily points the limitations and travails about having a blog and dialogue it spawns.

Personally, I think that Newmusicland is a microeconomy (or a series of microeconomies within a microeconomy) without much real at stake. Sure, there are prizes to win and teaching gigs to hand out, but in the end, it's a bloody struggle over bloody nothing, or a mad rush for crumbs (thanks to Joyce and Feldman), and even with the "best" resume and connections the distribution of laurels and better day jobs ultimately involves a large factor of the arbitrary. Establishing a public musical identity as a composer means taking a strong position, having strong opinions, and saying through our music in a very public way that I like this and (implicitly) not that. But are our strong opinions only to be placed in public in the form of our music, and not our words? When we switch to words, do we suddenly have a license to duck and cover?

i think its good to point out the drawbacks of blogging: everything we say online probably won't get us a better job and will most likely be used against us someday, and yes sometimes our online discussions probably amount to a hill of beans, but for those of us who remember the time before the internet, any information about newmusic was limted at best.

growing up in kansas i had little connection to newmusic or artmusic at all until college, but these days i first hear about somebody online much earlier than hear about it on "the street" . hopefully our ramblings give an accurate (although sometimes myopic) portrayal of the 'zeitgeist' in which we live. as i pointed out recently i am lucky to be a part of the southern california "cartesian school", but i also appreciate that our online newmusicland community that has connected me to people like daniel wolf, corey dargel, jeff harrington, and david toub (and a cast of others on my blogroll...now this is where the internet is like a big reacharound) just this weekend got into a emusic frenzy because of david toub's extensive mp3 link dump (david, i especially thank you for introducing me to real quiet, marc mellits, and steve layton)

like any community, it is only as vital as those who participate and there will always be more "lurkers" than than commentators. so far our little club seems to be pretty open to a wide variety of art and ideas, and we have mostly stayed away from throwing rocks at each other. (except a recent minor stoning of christopher rouse).

good ideas do crop up online, the recent discussion of open study scores has prompted me to start editing posting my own music. this semester at CSUF, the diverse instrument ensemble (d.i.e) has enjoyed rehearsing and is planning to perform of david toub’s online scores (when a 65 yr old faculty member brings a piece to rehearsal from the internet you know its having some effect). like fantasy baseball there is always going to be arguments about who the hero’s and villains are, but by telling these stories and sharing our experiences through our newmusicland microcommunity gives meaning to our strange and pitiful existence.

overall i am always interested in reading about people who are doing. reading about those who are actively involved in their community whether it be musiciology, kazoo training, writing ya fiction or grip work is much more interesting than passively consuming some of the latest feel good claptrap. everyday its easy to feel like we are faced with the 'faculty cafeteria' problem, surrounded by disgruntled who are forever complaining about how the young are fracking up our lives. by turning off the noise and joining a club (ferret blogs anyone?) our online microcommunities can serve as to channel the best of our collective ideas, creations and experiences.

*one of the my main internet conundrums is that there are ferret (we are new ferret parents) and lego train blogs, but i cannot figure out for the life of me why the music education community is so empty. maybe it is all because edwin gordon's sound before symbol theories have become reality?